We Never Solved Response. The one tool AI Agents need so they can finally act.

AI agents can already investigate a threat, and they have permission to act. What they can't do yet is decide whether a specific action is the right one, for this case, right now. That judgment is the hard part of autonomous response, and the industry has avoided it for a decade.

We never really solved response. SOAR promised automation, but most teams didn't trust it to act. At scale, "response" meant opening a ticket and waiting for a human. That doesn't hold up against attackers who use AI, move in swarms, and adapt in seconds.

In this session, Inbal Argov, VP Product Strategy at Mate Security, joins James Berthoty, founder of Latio, to look at what it takes to let agents act safely. Inbal will introduce CPR, a framework for scoring every response action on Confidence, Precision, and Reversibility. CPR weighs the cost of acting against the cost of not acting, then picks the least disruptive path that still resolves the threat. James will bring the analyst's view: where the market stands on autonomous response, what buyers should demand, and where the hype runs ahead of reality.

‍

• Why SOAR and ticket-driven workflows never delivered real response, and why that's no longer acceptable
• How the CPR framework helps humans and agents make defensible decisions under pressure
• How to decide when an agent should act on its own and when a human should stay in the loop
• How to choose the least disruptive action that still contains the threat
• What security leaders should ask before trusting any vendor's "autonomous response"

• CISOs
• SOC Managers
• IT executives and professionals